Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:05

Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Rory McIlroy Says He Shot 81 at Oakmont Last Week - Sports Illustrated
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do you think they're treating Diddy worse than Tate? Is it because of racism?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Poop Transplants Not All They’re Cracked Up to Be - Gizmodo
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Fugiat rerum itaque dolorem rem.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Poll: Is Xbox heading in the right direction? Cast your vote here! - Windows Central
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What drivers said at Pocono after Cup race won by Chase Briscoe - NBC Sports
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Seven Mindblowing Space Photos Taken This Month - PetaPixel
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.